A human focus for 21st century life sciences

03 - 04 February 2026 09:00 - 17:00 One Birdcage Walk Free Watch online
Request invitation

Science+ meeting organised by Professor Geoffrey J Pilkington, Ms Rebecca Ram and Ms Kathy Archibald on behalf of the Alliance for Human Relevant Science.

This meeting will showcase the transformative value of innovative, human-focused biomedical technologies, which are providing invaluable insights into human diseases and could underpin the development and optimal use of new and repurposed medicines. It will bring together researchers, clinicians, industries, regulators and others to discuss key challenges and how to surmount them to to accelerate their advantageous development and implementation.

Programme

The programme, including speaker biographies and abstracts, will be available soon. Please note the programme may be subject to change.

Poster session

There will be a poster session on Tuesday 3 February. If your request to attend is approved, you will be sent further information on how to submit your poster abstract. Submissions made within one month of the meeting may not be included in the programme booklet.

Attending this event

This event is intended for researchers in the relevant fields.

  • To attend virtually, please register and you will be sent a streaming link close to the meeting date
  • When requesting an in-person invitation, please briefly state your expertise and reasons for attending
  • Requests are reviewed by the meeting organisers on a rolling basis. You will receive a link to register if your request has been successful
  • Lunch is available on both days of the meeting for an optional £25 per day. There are plenty of places to eat nearby if you would prefer to purchase food offsite. Participants are welcome to bring their own lunch to the meeting

Enquiries: Scientific Programmes team.

Image credit: iStock.com / sturti

Organisers

  • Geoff Pilkington

    Professor Geoffrey J. Pilkington

    Geoff Pilkington is an Emeritus Professor of Neuro-oncology, having held chairs at King's College, London and the University of Portsmouth, where he was Director of the Brain Tumour Research Centre which exclusively used human cells, tissues and biomaterials in their research. He is a Past President of the British Neuro-oncology Society and Honorary Treasurer, Executive Board Member and Scientific Board Member of the European Association of Neuro-oncology as well as being a Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Biology. His published work was largely focussed around brain tumour invasion, the blood brain barrier, the tumour microenvironment, brain tumour modelling and repurposed drugs.

  • Rebecca Ram

    Ms Rebecca Ram

    Rebecca Ram is an independent scientific consultant to the Safer Medicines Trust, working in the field of human-relevant science for almost two decades. Prior to this, she worked for a decade as a clinical data manager and programmer within phase 1-IV clinical trials for pharmaceutical and clinical research organisations(CROs). Rebecca has a Masters (MSc) in Toxicology (with Bioinformatics) and a BSc in Applied Biology. Her particular interest is in the field of clinical and scientific research and policy, including development and regulatory acceptance of advanced in-vitro and computational methods, improved use of clinical data and  'big data' analysis, as well as transition to human relevant approaches in fundamental research and disease modelling.  Rebecca has written or co-authored occasional research papers and has presented at webinars, universities and colleges. She has also served on review committees for conference abstracts, publications and early career research awards.

  • Kathy Archibald

    Mrs Kathy Archibald

    Kathy Archibald is the chair of Safer Medicines Trust. She graduated in genetics from Nottingham University and went on to work for Searle Pharmaceuticals and Genetics International (which became MediSense before acquisition by Abbott Laboratories). She then spent a decade working in conservation, including as a teacher-naturalist for the RSPB, followed by educational fundraising in schools for Action for Children. She founded Safer Medicines Trust in 2005, to confront the poor relevance of much pharmaceutical research (based on animals) to human medicine and its serious consequences for patient safety. The Trust has held conferences at the Royal Society and the House of Lords, initiated the Safety of Medicines Bill and published many peer-reviewed papers, book chapters and a popular science book, Rat Trap. Safer Medicines Trust was a founder member of the Alliance for Human Relevant Science, which helped establish the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Human Relevant Science in 2020.

Schedule

Chair

Michael Coleman

Professor Michael Coleman

Aston University, UK

09:00-09:05 Welcome by the Royal Society and lead organiser
Professor Geoffrey J.  Pilkington

Professor Geoffrey J. Pilkington

University of Portsmouth, UK

09:05-09:25 A 50-year career reflection on models of human disease in research and pre-clinical testing: where are we now?
Professor Geoffrey J.  Pilkington

Professor Geoffrey J. Pilkington

University of Portsmouth, UK

09:25-09:45 Talk title TBC
09:45-10:15 Discussion
10:15-10:45 Break
10:45-11:05 HNRNPD: Guardian of the (beta cell) galaxy

Cellular stressors are inducers of cell identity change. In the pancreatic islet, factors such as high glucose and dysregulated lipid can cause cellular transdifferentiation events. This has been observed in human beta cells in vitro and in islets of people with diabetes.

Using a completely humanised system, we investigated the causes of pancreatic cell identity change by defining global gene expression patterns in normal and transdifferentiated cells after exposure to stress. We then tested the most dysregulated genes for causality using siRNA gene knockdown and hormone staining. We then investigated the impact of splicing-associated changes in the binding and expression of downstream targets. Finally, we explored the potential for reversal of cell identity changes by restoration of euglycaemia or manipulation of candidate isoform levels.

We identified the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein D (HNRNPD) gene as a potent protector of beta cell identity in the face of cellular stress. Cellular stressors caused a change in the splicing patterns of HNRNPD, with consequent disruption of the downstream beta cell development and function gene expression programs. We were able to demonstrate reversal of transdifferentiation events by removal of stress or manipulation of HNRNPD isoforms.

We have identified HNRNPD as a key factor involved in the protection of beta cell identity. HNRNPD splicing changes induced by disrupted metabolism cause a reversible switch from a beta cell to delta cell profile. The nature of the change is human-specific and underlines the importance of using human-relevant experimental systems to identify human-relevant disease processes. These findings may represent a potential future point of traction for protection of beta cell mass in face of diabetes.

Professor Lorna Harries

Professor Lorna Harries

Exeter University, UK

11:05-11:25 Drug-induced liver injury in clinical practice

It is critical to understand the in vivo animal test (IAT) when developing and accelerating adoption of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The specialist animal staff understand the strengths and weaknesses of their IATs, and their knowledge and experience are needed when developing and implementing NAMs. Each IAT performed results in many outputs (eg liver weight changes, clinical signs, biomarkers, metabolites formed etc) that are used to decide whether there is an adverse event or not. Each output can be converted into a context of use (CoU), with adverse outcome pathways devised and used to create NAMs (eg in vitro or computational tests). Many NAMs, alone or as batteries, are required to replicate all animal tests endpoints. The same process can be followed to replicate the CoUs in human disease. Both IATs and human NAMs should predict the human disease to be of value in a risk assessment or submission in a regulatory package. How does this impact on the staff working on these tests and the infrastructure? Whilst NAMs are phased in, those staff working on the animal tests can be trained in cell husbandry, dosing, and sample collection. This is no different to when they are retrained to work with different species. The technologies and knowledge used by support services, eg pathology, immunology and bioanalysis, are similar for NAMs and minimum retraining is envisaged. When repurposing a vivarium to a tissue culture lab, smaller rooms are needed, but temperature and humidity control is essential. NAM development needs stakeholders with animal test knowledge to accurately develop CoUs for NAMs development.

Professor Guruprasad Padur Aithal

Professor Guruprasad Padur Aithal

University of Nottingham, UK

11:25-11:55 Discussion
11:55-12:35 Panel discussion: A range of human relevant models for human diseases

Chair

Malcolm Wilkinson

Professor Malcolm Wilkinson

Sheffield University, UK

13:30-13:45 Optional ornament or crucial code? The role of modelling and simulation in human safety assessment
Dr Ciarán Fisher

Dr Ciarán Fisher

GSK, UK

13:45-14:00 Human-based in silico medicine for drug development
Professor Blanca Rodriguez

Professor Blanca Rodriguez

University of Oxford, UK

14:00-14:15 In silico tools in preclinical safety assessment
14:15-14:45 Discussion
14:45-15:15 Break
15:15-15:30 Talk title TBC
Dr Dharaminder Singh

Dr Dharaminder Singh

Formerly CN Bio, UK

15:30-15:45 Vascularized microtissues and the potential of microphysiological systems
Professor Christopher Hughes

Professor Christopher Hughes

University of California, Irvine, US

15:45-16:00 Discussion
16:00-16:30 Panel discussion: Cross talk between new technologies and research applications
16:30-16:50 Flash talks x 4
16:50-17:00 Day 1 closing remarks
Professor Geoffrey J.  Pilkington

Professor Geoffrey J. Pilkington

University of Portsmouth, UK

17:00-18:15 Poster session

Chair

Chris Hughes

Professor Christopher Hughes

University of California, Irvine, US

09:00-09:05 Opening remarks and introductions
09:05-09:25 Drug safety, pharmacogenomics and personalised medicine
Sir Munir Pirmohamed

Sir Munir Pirmohamed

University of Liverpool, UK

09:25-09:45 Cardiovascular diseases and drugs: Where are we with hiPSC models?

Derivation of cardiovascular cell types from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) generated from patient tissues or introducing targeted mutations into healthy control hPSCs is an area of growing interest as a platform for disease modelling, drug discovery and (cardio)toxicity. Our lab has been investigating microtissue solutions in which cardiomyocytes and cardiac vascular and stromal cells are present. The presence of cardiac stromal cells promotes cardiomyocyte maturation. By combining cardiac microtissues with new methods for functional phenotyping, we have been able to quantify the outcomes of drug and disease mutation responses in situ in high throughput. The use of isogenic pairs of hiPSC lines with and without mutations has proven very important since variability between “healthy control” hiPSC lines is often greater than the difference between diseased cells and its isogenic control. Examples of studies investigating disease and drug responses in cardiac microtissues will be shown. These approaches have allowed us to identify which cell types in the heart are responsible for the disease phenotypes observed in vitro indicating which cells we might target for therapy. Moreover, we have been successful in automating the production of healthy and disease cardiac microtissues such that they can be used for high throughput drug screens. These complex cell systems are paving the way towards better understanding of disease mechanisms and drug discovery.

Professor Christine Mummery

Professor Christine Mummery

Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands

09:45-10:15 Discussion
10:15-10:45 Break
10:45-11:00 3D cell culture models and their role in enhancing genotoxicity testing approaches for nano- and advanced-materials

Standard in vitro genotoxicity testing approaches have limitations for testing nanomaterials (NMs) and in 2013, an OECD expert panel concluded it was necessary to adapt the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test (OECD TG487) to facilitate evaluation of manufactured NMs. An OECD project was initiated, aimed at developing a new OECD Guidance Document detailing the necessary steps to adapt OECD TG487 for NMs, which was subsequently published in Sept 2022 (Series on Testing and Assessment No. 359; ENV/CBC/MONO(2022)15). Whilst ongoing efforts have focused on adapting existing OECD TGs for NMs testing, limitations remain as existing in vitro approaches lack physiological relevance, often do not consider long-term exposure effects, and do not cover all mechanisms of action underpinning genotoxicity. New approach methodologies (NAMs) provide the opportunity to overcome these issues and there have been substantial developments in this area over recent years. For example, co-culture models incorporating epithelial and macrophage cells can detect secondary genotoxicity, a key nanomaterial mode of action only detected in vivo. Additionally, 3D liver spheroids exhibit higher metabolic capacity, which is important for identifying pro-carcinogens. These models also support longer-term, repeated dosing, which is more representative of nanomaterial human exposure. The broad field of NAMs to better support regulatory decision making is therefore gaining momentum, with a variety of promising technologies emerging.

Professor Shareen H Doak

Professor Shareen H Doak

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), UK

11:05-11:25 Which contexts of use arise from animal studies for new approach methods development?

It is critical to understand the in vivo animal test (IAT) when developing and accelerating adoption of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The specialist animal staff understand the strengths and weaknesses of their IATs, and their knowledge and experience are needed when developing and implementing NAMs. Each IAT performed results in many outputs (e.g. liver weight changes, clinical signs, biomarkers, metabolites formed etc) that are used to decide whether there is an adverse event or not. Each output can be converted into a context of use (CoU), with adverse outcome pathways devised and used to create NAMs (e.g. in vitro or computational tests). Many NAMs, alone or as batteries, are required to replicate all animal tests endpoints. The same process can be followed to replicate the CoUs in human disease. Both IATs and human NAMs should predict the human disease to be of value in a risk assessment or submission in a regulatory package. How does this impact on the staff working on these tests and the infrastructure? Whilst NAMs are phased in, those staff working on the animal tests can be trained in cell husbandry, dosing, and sample collection. This is no different to when they are retrained to work with different species. The technologies and knowledge used by support services, e.g. pathology, immunology and bioanalysis, are similar for NAMs and minimum retraining is envisaged. When repurposing a vivarium to a tissue culture lab, smaller rooms are needed, but temperature and humidity control is essential. NAM development needs stakeholders with animal test knowledge to accurately develop CoUs for NAMs development.

Dr Clive Roper

Dr Clive Roper

Roper Toxicology Consulting Limited, UK

11:25-11:45 Discussion
11:45-12:30 Panel discussion: The state of play; preclinical to clinical drug safety and regulatory perspectives

13:30-13:50 Why we need social sciences to understand our behaviour and make faster progress together

As a newly graduated veterinarian in 1986, I aimed to improve animal welfare and scientific quality to enhance the translation of animal research to humans. At the time, I believed animal studies were necessary and evidence-based. Early in my career, I focused on implementing the 3Rs, particularly Reduction and Refinement. Over time, however, I realized that the 3Rs alone were insufficient. Systematic reviews proved more effective, as they directly supported 3R implementation by e.g. identifying unnecessary duplication. These reviews also revealed the poor quality of animal study publications and the lack of (predictors for) successful translation to humans.

This led me to shift away from animal studies toward more human-relevant science, especially given advances in New Approach Methods (NAMs) such as organoids, AI, and better use of human-based data. Together with historians, I analysed animal testing requirements in legislation and found they were largely based on crisis-driven decisions rather than solid scientific evidence. The COVID-19 pandemic further demonstrated that development timelines for vaccines could be drastically shortened through increased use of NAMs, reduced animal testing, use of existing data, and earlier clinical trials.

In the Netherlands, I joined the government-initiated Transition to Animal-Free Innovations program, applying transition /social sciences to accelerate this shift. This interdisciplinary approach brings together multiple disciplines in academia, industry, policymakers, and regulators. Supported by dedicated funding, I became co-chair of the SAFE consortium (Safety Assessment through animal-Free Evolution), which studies barriers to regulatory adoption of animal-free methods and how to accelerate progress toward more human-relevant science.

Professor Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga

Professor Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga

Utrecht University, The Netherlands

13:50-14:10 Driving change through better evidence to improve decision-making
Dr Katya Hélin

Dr Katya Hélin

Akttyva Therapeutics, US

14:10-14:30 Talk title TBC
14:30-14:50 Talk title TBC
Dr Mona Boyé

Dr Mona Boyé

Ksilink, France

14:50-15:15 Break
15:15-16:45 Panel discussion: How to drive 'real world' implementation of human focused methods into 21st century life sciences
16:45-17:00 Reflections, next steps and concluding remarks from co-organisers
Professor Geoffrey J.  Pilkington

Professor Geoffrey J. Pilkington

University of Portsmouth, UK

Ms Rebecca Ram

Ms Rebecca Ram

Safer Medicines Trust, UK

Mrs Kathy Archibald

Mrs Kathy Archibald

Safer Medicines Trust, UK